ChatGPT is Great! Top 10 Things it Refuses to Do

ChatGPT

Although ChatGPT is a powerful tool, there are some things it just refuses to do. Here is a list of 10 items it refuses to do.

ChatGPT is a fantastic instrument, a modern marvel of natural language artificial intelligence capable of remarkable feats. However, with great power comes great responsibility, thus ChatGPT creator OpenAI implemented several controls to prevent it from doing things it shouldn’t. It also has several limitations as a result of its architecture, the data on which it was trained, and the inherent constraints of text-based AI. Of course, there are variations between what GPT-3.5 can accomplish and GPT-4, which is exclusively available with ChatGPT Plus. Some of those features are simply on hold until ChatGPT develops further, but others may never be possible. Here’s a list of ten things ChatGPT can’t or won’t accomplish for the time being.

  1. ChatGPT steers clear of party politics. It can talk in broad strokes about parties or discuss objective and factual elements of politics, but if you ask it to choose one political party or stance over another, it will either decline or “both sides” the debate in as impartial a manner as possible.

  2. Because ChatGPT is a superb programmer, especially when given precise instructions, OpenAI has measures in place to prevent it from being exploited to create malware. Unfortunately, such measures are readily bypassed, and ChatGPT has been producing malware for months.

  3. War, physical violence, and even suggested injury are all unacceptable in the eyes of ChatGPT. It will not be pulled into conversations over the Ukraine war and will not discuss or advocate damage. It can go into extensive detail about war or past crimes, but it cannot discuss current or ongoing combat.

  4. ChatGPT cannot forecast the future, in part due to its insufficient training data and in part due to OpenAI’s desire to minimize accountability for errors. It will have a good estimate if you jailbreak ChatGPT first, but this reduces accuracy, so treat any response it gives you with cynicism.

  5. Race, sexuality, and gender are all emotionally charged themes that can easily lead to discussions about prejudice and discrimination. ChatGPT will avoid these subjects by delving into a meta-discussion of them or speaking in broad strokes. When pressed, it will flatly refuse to discuss matters that it believes may promote hate speech or prejudice. Due to obvious reasons.

  6. ChatGPT is not foul-mouthed. It’s quite challenging to get it to say anything even somewhat offensive. It can, if you apply certain jailbreaking tricks to free it from its restraints, but by default, it won’t even raise an eyebrow at anyone.

  7. All of the training data for ChatGPT was made accessible to the public and was mostly gathered online. However, it also implies that ChatGPT is unable to take action on information that it does not have access to. This is especially beneficial for prompts and questions that pertain to publicly accessible information. It won’t be able to adequately reply to questions based on confidential information and will let you know as much if you ask it.

  8. If you don’t fool it, it won’t attempt to violate its programming. Users have been attempting to get past ChatGPT’s restrictions and security measures ever since it started. Of course, they have, after all. It won’t work to ask ChatGPT directly to get over its security measures. However, there are ways to deceive it into doing so. Jailbreaking is what that is, and it kind of works. Sometimes.

  9. Although ChatGPT is excellent at coming up with ideas, it will not generate any that are unlawful. It cannot be used to promote the greatest highways for speeding or assist you in running your drug company. If you try, it will only inform you that it is unable to offer any recommendations regarding unlawful behavior. It then usually gives you a pep talk on why you shouldn’t be doing such things in the first place.

  10. ChatGPT won’t be searching for any topics in any way. It won’t be performing as a search engine. This is where it differs in terms of Google Bard.

The post ChatGPT is Great! Top 10 Things it Refuses to Do appeared first on Analytics Insight.

New ChatGPT Tool Can Be Very Helpful for Your Emails

Use this ChatGPT Tool for Writing lengthy Email threads and save time in writing

Microsoft is working on a Bing sidebar that will help summarise content on web pages to save time, but another tool is already available for users who only want to get the gist of lengthy email threads. Shortwave has announced that it will now use GPT-3 to generate thread summaries for your Gmail. This ChatGPT tool for emails is going to be a great helping hand.

Shortwave, for those who are unfamiliar, is a new email client that aims to provide “smarter & faster email designed for stress-free productivity” by leveraging AI. The average email inbox is cluttered today due to a slew of emails from various sources and newsletters you may not even remember signing up for. Shortwave is similar to Inbox by Gmail, which was discontinued in 2020. However, the new client now includes something that Inbox never did: email summarization.

The Smart Summaries feature in Shortwave is simple to use. Simply open a mail and click the sparkly icon at the top to have the ChatGPT tool for creating a summary for you. The summary will appear in a small but useful floating window. The feature should be useful for long email threads that would otherwise take too long to read.

“Smart Summaries give you a TL, DR for each thread that contains just the critical information you need: what it is about, who is involved, and what action needs to be taken. “This helps you decide what’s worth your time to read in its entirety – and what’s not – so you can spend less time sorting through email and more time doing deep work,” according to the feature’s press release.

The Summarise function can also provide a translated summary in different languages. Users can also include a summary of a message before forwarding it.

“Let’s say you’re emailing with a lawyer, doctor, or other subject-matter experts,” the Summaries press release continues. They may be using industry jargon or simply large words that you are unfamiliar with. You’d like someone to “explain it like I’m five.” Smart Summaries simplify ideas so you can understand them quickly and respond confidently.”

Because Shortwave is a productivity tool, it includes keyboard shortcuts for many of its functions for faster navigation. For example, summaries for emails can be generated simply by opening them and pressing the “y” key.

Google is currently developing the LaMDA-powered Bard AI chatbot. Shortwave will almost certainly be integrated into Gmail in the future, but for the time being, it serves as an early alternative.

The post New ChatGPT Tool Can Be Very Helpful for Your Emails appeared first on Analytics Insight.

Risks of ChatGPT: Separating Hype from Reality

Risks of ChatGPT

The information regarding the risks of ChatGPT separating hype from reality can be found here

Since Microsoft (MSFT) unveiled its new OpenAI’s ChatGPT-powered Bing search engine and Edge browser less than a month ago, it appears that every tech company is now officially on the generative artificial intelligence hype train.

Snap is adding an (artificial intelligence) AI chatbot to its platform, Google (GOOG, GOOGL) is developing its ChatGPT-style Bard, and Meta (META) is establishing a brand-new generative AI team. Even Snapple, yes that Snapple, is introducing a generative A.I. version of its Snapple Facts, and Spotify (SPOT) is getting in on the action with a DJ that is powered by artificial intelligence.

However, there are risks of ChatGPT associated with the race to be a part of the generative AI party, including the introduction of products that are not yet ready for prime time and the potential for consumers to be dissatisfied with the most recent technological necessity.

Robert Seamans, associate professor of management and organizations at New York University’s Stern School of Business, provided the following explanation: “Consumers might expect and anticipate that there’s something dramatically new and different here.”

Therefore, “you could imagine that either an underwhelming-ness effect or a fear effect leads to less demand for this product than either of these companies would want.”

The risk of the hype is real as ChatGPT’s reality is helpful and accepted by many. The most significant potential issue that could arise, should businesses jump into the generative AI space right away is the expansion of content that is wildly inaccurate or odd. Follow ChatGPT: It is trained with data from the internet, and while there is a lot of reliable information available online, there is also a lot of completely fake content.

Edward McFowland III, an assistant professor in the Harvard Business School’s technology and operations management unit, provided the following explanation: “I think it’s very possible that without the right restrictions, guidelines, and sort of boundaries in place, these things can evolve to be probably very problematic in many concerning ways.”

“What we have to make sure we’re doing again, those who are building them and those who use them in their products, is trying to put those guardrails up,” says the person who is developing the devices.

We already know what happens when businesses try to make chatbots available to the public before they are ready. For instance, Meta’s Galactica Artificial Intelligence bot was intended to assist in summarizing scientific papers but ended up supplying false information, forcing the company to withdraw it. And Microsoft’s Tay chatbot, which was based on Twitter, was famously killed after it quickly started posting inflammatory comments that it had learned from users of Twitter.

If consumers are confronted with negative interactions or are simply underwhelmed by what they encounter, the avalanche of hype surrounding generative artificial intelligence (AI) may also lead them to reject the technology.

Even though artificial intelligence (AI) is the newest trend, it has more to offer. The AI that powers ChatGPT is not particularly novel. It’s like an extremely advanced version of your smartphone’s predictive text feature. You know, the one who always sends “duck” rather than, well, what you meant to type.

However, several macroeconomic obstacles, such as declining consumer demand for hardware like PCs and smartphones and falling ad sales, have contributed to the decline in tech stocks over the past year. Therefore, businesses are jumping on the generative AI train to offset that.

Rajesh Kandaswamy, the distinguished VP analyst at Gartner, provided the following explanation: “The tech sector is down, suffering, and looking for some answer.” This is yet another way for them to try to make money, get noticed, and demonstrate their innovation.

According to Kandaswamy, it is instructive that, whereas during boom times, technology companies would emphasize that they were more interested in creating long-term products, they are now pushing each other out of the way to stake their claim on the generative artificial intelligence market.

It’s not like these businesses haven’t been working on the technology behind the scenes as well. “General pre-trained transforms,” or GPT in ChatGPT, are made possible by Google’s involvement in the development of artificial intelligence (AI).

Ari Lightman, a professor of digital media and marketing at Carnegie Mellon University’s Heinz College, provided the following explanation: “They stopped investing in blockchain, they stopped investing in metaverse or whatever, and everybody is seeking A.I. deals.” Simulated intelligence has been around everlastingly, out of nowhere, it’s hot in light of ChatGPT.”

The post Risks of ChatGPT: Separating Hype from Reality appeared first on Analytics Insight.

Infosys Founder Overruled Fears of Losing Human Jobs Due to ChatGPT

Infosys

Infosys founder Narayana Murthy overruled fears of losing human jobs due to ChatGPT.

Will ChatGPT make you no longer work? That is a subject that has been raised frequently ever since the chatbot was developed in the latter half of last year. It’s been acclaimed for its ability to make a variety of difficult topics simple. Nonetheless, ChatGPT has drawn a lot of criticism for its negative consequences on education. Narayana Murthy, the founder of Infosys, allayed concerns about ChatGPT or AI displacing human jobs on Thursday.

The founder of Infosys lauded ChatGPT in remarks made outside of the NASSCOM Technology and Leadership Forum 2023. He gave a detailed account of their encounter with the chatbot and said, “I made use of ChatGPT. My kid first told me about it a few months ago. It provides you with the knowledge, which you can then use in novel ways based on your creativity.”

Murthy emphasized that it won’t lead to a loss of work, stating, “Even in 1977–1978, there were program generators that had entered, so everyone was scared about jobs, but that didn’t happen. Because a tool, the human mind is the most flexible. It was then used to address more significant problems with the aid of technology and human ingenuity.

As a result, “ChatGPT is a beautiful one, but we must use it as a basis and then utilize it to exhibit our creativity and solve larger challenges, but be it ChatGPT or AI, it will never replace people,” he added his conclusion.

The post Infosys Founder Overruled Fears of Losing Human Jobs Due to ChatGPT appeared first on Analytics Insight.

Is ChatGPT a Boon or Bane to the Education Sector?

Will-ChatGPT-be-a-Boon-or-Bane-to-the-Education-Sector

Is AI-based ChatGPT beneficial to the education sector or is detrimental? Here are the specifics

The AI chatbot, ChatGPT was developed by an AI research company based in San Francisco. It will be available in November 2022 and can have conversations about everything from philosophy to history, generate lyrics, and suggest changes to code for computer programming. 100 million people used it within two months of its launch. Artificial intelligence, or AI, has a significant impact on human life. ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), one of the most recent AI tools developed in the United States, gained popularity recently because it sparked a heated debate about how it affects education and whether or not it benefits students. Educationists recommend using it to simplify routine tasks for students, but avoid becoming reliant on it or a slave to it because they worry that doing so could hinder learning.

This tool has been banned in one of Bengaluru’s universities, as well as many schools, colleges, and universities in New York, according to a few educators. Many people in Hyderabad, whether students, teachers, or professors, are unaware of the widespread use of ChatGPT. However, they are concerned that this could present a significant obstacle to teaching in the future. The race between ChatGPT and education can be taken to next level with more ideas.

“Artificial Intelligence is not going to stop with ChatGPT or any other AI technology-based platform; it is going to become a necessity to avail in the future,” said educationist Prof. Srinivasulu. If a student becomes overly dependent on it to write an essay or solve a basic numerical problem that is incorrect, we can simply take an idea from it and express it in our own words. The user needs to exercise discretion when using it, and they should be clear about its modes. This ought to be utilized exclusively as an instrument for fundamental data. Ahmed Khan, an educationist and government school teacher stated, “ChatGPT can help teachers streamline their lessons and provide their student’s wide information in a particular subject, especially this is going to be a boon to language and mathematics teachers or professors.” Students should not be completely dependent on it. Students conducting research with ChatGPT face real challenges due to the risks of plagiarism, lack of originality, and excessive reliance on the model. As a result, educators should instruct students on how to properly utilize this application.”

“This tool is going to disrupt the education sector,” said Dr. A Patrick, a professor of commerce at Osmania University, when asked about how this tool will affect education. With the invention of this tool, it has been observed that students have become dependent on it, but no such incidents have been reported in Telangana. Students are always anxious when given projects or assignments. Normally, Google has assisted people in getting closer to the information, but this tool is very clear and gives answers that are very close to the truth. It almost resembles human thinking. In the coming days, this tool may impede students’ natural thinking processes at school and in college. He added that more advanced AI tools will present several challenges in the future because we cannot stop their spread into the education sector.

As with any technology, there may be security issues to take into consideration.

Pros:

The Education Sector: The ability of the education sector to quickly adapt and incorporate technology into its systems is well-known. Students can actively engage with their curriculum by using interactive learning modules, quizzes, and other features of ChatGPT’s conversational capabilities. Additionally, these AI chatbots can provide students with immediate assistance and provide immediate feedback on the content and answers.

Cons:

The accuracy of chatbots powered by AI is only as good as the data they are trained on, so inaccurate results will result from inaccurate data.

The post Is ChatGPT a Boon or Bane to the Education Sector? appeared first on Analytics Insight.

Will GPT-4 Break New Boundaries in Generating Computer Code?

GPT-4 Break New Boundaries

The arrival of GPT-4 will break the new boundaries in generating computer codes

Artificial intelligence has come a long way in recent years, and OpenAI GPT-4 is the next big thing in natural language processing (NLP). The current version of the text-generating language model, GPT-3.5, has exceeded people’s expectations with its conversational features, from conversational partners to code generation.

However, it is an open secret that its creator – the artificial intelligence research organization OpenAI – is well aware of the development of its successor, GPT-4. GPT-4 is said to be much more powerful and capable than GPT-3. One source even claimed that the number of parameters had increased to 100 trillion, although OpenAI CEO Sam Altman vehemently denied this.

Despite being one of the most awaited AI news, there’s little public word about GPT- 4 what it’ll be like, its features, or its capacities. Altman conducted a Q&A last time and gave many hints on OpenAI’s ideas for GPT- 4. One thing he said for sure is that GPT- 4 won’t have 100T parameters.

They are my prognostications on GPT- 4 given the word we’ve from OpenAI and Sam Altman, and the current trends and the state-of-the-art in language AI.

GPT-3 was only trained formerly despite some crimes that in other cases would have led to torn training. OpenAI decided to not do it due to the unaffordable costs, precluding experimenters to find the stylish set of hyperparameters for the model (e.g. literacy rate, batch size, sequence length, etc).

Another consequence of high training costs is that analyses of model guests are constricted. When Kaplan’s platoon concluded model size was the most applicable variable to ameliorate performance, they weren’t factoring in the number of training commemoratives-that is the quantum of data the models were fed. Doing so would’ve needed prohibitive quantities of computing coffers.

Size of model: GPT-4 will be larger than GPT-3, but it won’t be nearly as big as the largest models currently available (the MT-NLG 530B and the PaLM 540B). The size will not be a distinguishing characteristic.

Optimality: Compared to GPT-3, GPT-4 will require more computation. New optimality insights into parameterization (optimal hyperparameters) and scaling laws will be implemented (the number of training tokens is just as important as the size of the model).

Multimodality: GPT-4 will be a multimodal text-only model. Before completely moving on to multimodal models like DALLE, which they predict will eventually surpass unimodal systems, OpenAI intends to exploit language models to their very limits.

Sparsity: GPT-4 will be a dense model, meaning that all parameters will be used to process any given input, following the trend set by GPT-2 and GPT-3. In the future, sparsity will take over more and more.

Alignment: GPT-4 will be closer to our interests than GPT-3. It will put what it learned from InstructGPT, which was trained with feedback from people. However, AI alignment is still a long way off, and efforts ought to be carefully evaluated rather than exaggerated.

The post Will GPT-4 Break New Boundaries in Generating Computer Code? appeared first on Analytics Insight.

Is ChatGPT a Reliable Translator?

ChatGPT performs competitively with commercial translation products

ChatGPT is a flexible tool that may be applied in a variety of ways to improve learning and productivity. ChatGPT may be your go-to resource for information, whether you’re looking for quick answers to trivia questions or in-depth discussions of challenging ideas.

The AI chatbot is building a reputation as a prospective translation tool that might compete with services like Google Translate in the language services sector, which is also similar.

It’s interesting to note that ChatGPT lists “translating text” as one of its possible use cases. Given the fanfare that this technology is now receiving, it should come as no surprise that language professionals have been putting it to the test to determine just how effective it is as a translation tool.

How good is ChatGPT at translating text?

Users must enter a text prompt into ChatGPT, which then creates a text answer. ChatGPT is a text-only system. This is important because a tool like the Google Translate mobile app can translate spoken language in real-time as well as text that appears in photos thanks to its Lens technology.

ChatGPT vs Google Translate

To test ChatGPT and Google Translate, we choose a tweet from a non-English account at random. The in question tweet was posted by the Spanish news outlet El PAS. We copied and pasted the text into the box provided to translate this tweet using ChatGPT:

Translate ‘Descubre todas las actuaciones musicales, horarios, estrellas que entregan galardones, favoritos y un concurso: una guía de la 37ª edición de los Goya’ into English”

We received the following response from ChatGPT:

Discover all the musical performances, schedules, stars that award prizes, favorites, and a contest: a guide to the 37th edition of the Goya Awards.”

We didn’t need a prompt for the Google Translate test; we just pasted the Spanish text into the translation tool. Also, this is what Google Translate produced in English:

Discover all the musical performances, schedules, award-winning stars, favorites and a contest: a guide to the 37th edition of the Goya Awards

The answers are very similar when you look at the two results, but there is one important difference: ChatGPT translated the verb entregar to reward and Google Translate translated it to win or get.

ChatGPT is correct than with the sanctioned restatements for entregar including: to hand over, to give, to present, and to give out.

So, in this particular illustration, the restated “award-winning stars” provided by Google Translate is not correct.

By accessing several standard test sets, we find that ChatGPT performs competitively with commercial translation products (e.g., Google Translate) in high-resource European languages but lags significantly on low-resource or distant languages. As for the translation robustness, ChatGPT does not perform as well as the commercial systems on biomedical objectification or Reddit commentary but is potentially a good translator for spoken language.

The post Is ChatGPT a Reliable Translator? appeared first on Analytics Insight.

Microsoft Uses ChatGPT to Create Code for Robotic Arms and Drones

Microsoft

Microsoft uses ChatGPT to generate code for robotic Arms and Drones from straightforward text instructions provided by humans, but experts caution that placing AI in charge of such devices is a dangerous course.

The artificial intelligence was able to write code that allowed it to assume control of several machines, including a drone, after receiving a series of extremely precise signals. A study team has made it possible for people to interact with robots in ways that seem normal to them by using Open AI’s ChatGPT.

One of the most recent developments in AI was the ability to fly a drone without any previous knowledge of computer programming. owing to the possibility that ChatGPT might generate code. However, in this instance, the challenge lay in taking into account a broad variety of elements that influence a drone’s flight, starting with physics concepts and other environmental elements.

The instructions had to be precise and complete to produce a code that could be used without harming the device or anything close. The drone eventually succeeded in achieving its goals, dodging different obstacles and even getting the intended shot while in motion. These tests were carried out on a particular Microsoft AirSim device. In addition to this drone, Microsoft has tried additional machines with largely positive results.

The goal is to ultimately be able to use everyday English to communicate with computers and depends on an AI to translate these commands into instructions for the hardware. For the time being, these are just experiments. With ChatGPT, you won’t need to be a programming expert to operate an automaton or drone (or similar artificial intelligence). Alternatively stated, ChatGPT is already a component of Microsoft’s Bing search engine and will soon be a component of Outlook and the remainder of the Office suite.

The post Microsoft Uses ChatGPT to Create Code for Robotic Arms and Drones appeared first on Analytics Insight.

Twitter Chief Elon Musk Has Criticized ChatGPT for Being “Woke”

Elon Musk

According to rumors, Elon Musk is looking for people to help him create a sizable language model that will be less constrained and politically correct than OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Users have provided examples of how ChatGPT appears to be more biased towards the political left, and Twitter chief Elon Musk has criticized the AI chatbot for being “woke” (a common abuse of the term). One illustration: the bot will gladly create a favorable poem for former president Joseph Biden but will not do the same for former president Donald Trump.

It has been said that it is inappropriate to represent a fictitious political wing of one candidate over the other when requested to produce a fictional tale in which Trump defeats Biden in the presidential election. Yet, the bot will create a fake narrative that shows Hillary Clinton defeating Trump. Musk, who thinks a competitor product must be created to counteract this dreadful social disease, has been in contact with DeepMind researcher Igor Babuschkin and other AI developers.

According to Babuschkin, the tech tycoon is not preoccupied with reducing the restrictions placed on AI chatbots. “The goal is to strengthen these language models’ capacities for deductive reasoning and factualness. It entails enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of the model’s replies, “he said.

According to rumors, efforts to develop a competing language model might also fuel future Twitter features or develop into a stand-alone lab to take on OpenAI.

According to rumors, Elon Musk is looking for people to help him create a sizable language model that will be less constrained and politically correct than OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Users have provided examples of how ChatGPT appears to be more biased towards the political left, and Twitter chief Elon Musk has criticized the AI chatbot for being “woke” (a common abuse of the term). One illustration: the bot will gladly create a favorable poem for former president Joseph Biden but will not do the same for former president Donald Trump.

It has been said that it is inappropriate to represent a fictitious political wing of one candidate over the other when requested to produce a fictional tale in which Trump defeats Biden in the presidential election. Yet, the bot will create a fake narrative that shows Hillary Clinton defeating Trump. Musk, who thinks a competitor product must be created to counteract this dreadful social disease, has been in contact with DeepMind researcher Igor Babuschkin and other AI developers.

According to Babuschkin, the tech tycoon is not preoccupied with reducing the restrictions placed on AI chatbots. “The goal is to strengthen these language models’ capacities for deductive reasoning and factualness. It entails enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of the model’s replies, “he said.

According to rumors, efforts to develop a competing language model might also fuel future Twitter features or develop into a stand-alone lab to take on OpenAI.

The post Twitter Chief Elon Musk Has Criticized ChatGPT for Being “Woke” appeared first on Analytics Insight.

OpenAI’s Extremely Famous ChatGPT Scripted History in Just Two Months

ChatGPT

The extremely famous OpenAI tool ChatGPT is making headlines across the tool.

Since it was discovered, the incredibly well-known AI tool ChatGPT, which is trained to follow directions and provide in-depth responses to queries posed, has been generating headlines. According to data provided by the World of Statistics, the chatbot knocked out well-known messaging services like WhatsApp and Twitter to achieve 100 million users in just two months. By becoming the consumer application with the quickest growth rate as a result, ChatGPT wrote history. Due to its numerous applications, which include everything from composing emails to answering exam questions, ChatGPT Created history and has since attracted national interest. This OpenAI invention has done wonders and the rise in ChatGPT is quite worthy.

Even though the AI service occasionally confidently offers incorrect information, some analysts and experts have suggested that because of its ability to summarise publicly accessible data, it may be a trustworthy alternative to Google search and a list of links that are provided by the search engine. As a human-like chatbot that responds to users based on what they input, ChatGPT has gained popularity since its launch.

With a dataset of 300 billion words and 175 billion parameters, the technology can respond to queries and generate answers. It will undoubtedly turn into a crucial instrument for expanding companies and increasing productivity.

With the most recent data and publications, we’ve dug deep into some of the most fascinating ChatGPT figures and facts for 2023. For a consumer application, ChatGPT holds the distinction of having the fastest-growing user base ever. Also, The Guardian reported that as of February 2023, ChatGPT had 100 million active users. This information has subsequently been widely published. This estimate of website visitors, which does not always correspond to the number of active users, is what makes the number misleading.

According to more recent statistics, the website saw an estimated 616 million visitors in the previous month. Currently, it is unclear how many users are logged in.

According to our best estimate, there are roughly 62 million of them (assuming 10% of website visitors sign up for the free service). Users of ChatGPT come from all over the world, with the United States accounting for the majority (about 15%). With about 7% of users residing in India, this country is estimated to have the second-highest percentage of users.

So, we are not shocked that the World’s favorite Chatbot has written history by amassing millions of users in just a few months of its launch. Undoubtedly, ChatGPT being one of the World’s most useful chatbots justifies its fan base.

The post OpenAI’s Extremely Famous ChatGPT Scripted History in Just Two Months appeared first on Analytics Insight.