In a surprising turn of events, Intel announced the immediate departure of CEO Pat Gelsinger, marking the end of a tumultuous three-year tenure that saw the company’s stock decline by over 50%.
Tensions over the company’s strategic direction have been brewing behind the scenes for some time now. According to reports, Intel’s board of directors discussed various transformative options, including private equity transactions and the potential separation of Intel’s factory and product-design businesses, but Gelsinger opposed them.
Instead, he remained committed to his vision of restoring Intel’s technological edge while developing its foundry services for external clients.
The departure/ouster appears to stem from fundamental disagreements about Intel’s future trajectory. Olivier Blanchard, research director at Futurum Group, in an interview with Yahoo Finance, noted that Gelsinger viewed his role as a “passion project” with a clear vision for the company’s direction. He further said that there were evidently “differences in opinions about where the company needed to go,” according to industry analysts.
The split between Intel’s foundry and design businesses emerged as a particularly contentious issue, likely serving as a catalyst for the leadership change.
Erik Stromquist, an investment advisor, told a news publication that this is not good news because ‘Pat was the strategy.’
The timing of this transition is particularly crucial as Intel faces multiple strategic challenges, including catching up in the AI chip race, where competitors like NVIDIA have taken a commanding lead. The company is also navigating complex manufacturing decisions, exemplified by its recent move to have its new Core Ultra chips manufactured by TSMC rather than its own facilities.
Two CEOs? What Does That Mean?
David Zinsner and Michelle Johnston Holthaus have been appointed interim co-CEOs, bringing complementary strengths to the leadership table. Zinsner, with over 25 years of experience in finance and operations within the semiconductor sector, continues his role as CFO while taking on additional responsibilities.
Holthaus, a nearly three-decade Intel veteran, assumes the newly created position of CEO of Intel Products, overseeing crucial divisions including client computing, data centre and AI, and network and edge groups.
The immediate focus for the interim leadership appears twofold. First, they must reassure the market about Intel’s stability and direction. As Blanchard notes, “The very first step is to hopefully assure the market that everything is going smoothly; everything is on the right track”.
Second, they face the challenge of accelerating Intel’s transformation. The company’s board has emphasised the need to strengthen the product portfolio and advance manufacturing capabilities. Frank Yeary, Intel’s interim executive chair, has made it clear: “Returning to process leadership remains central to our mission as we deliver for our customers and restore investor confidence.”
The new leadership faces several immediate challenges. Intel’s Q2 2024 results revealed concerning trends, with revenue declining 0.9% year-over-year and a net loss of $1.61 billion. The company’s struggles in the AI chip market, where NVIDIA has established dominance, have become particularly acute.
The interim leadership must navigate crucial strategic decisions, including the potential separation of Intel’s foundry and design businesses, a move that Gelsinger had opposed but might now be back on the table. This structural change could prevent regulatory concerns and provide a substantial cash injection for the company.
Jo-Ellen Pozner, professor at UC Berkeley’s Haas School of Business, suggests that the board’s decision signals a serious commitment to strategic change: “Companies often choose to make big statements like this because they know Wall Street will respond favourably.”
As expected, Intel’s shares rose over 4% in premarket trading following the announcement. However, they ended down by 0.5%, suggesting that there is no quick fix for Intel.
What to Expect from the Next CEO?
As the company lurches forward, advancing Intel’s manufacturing capabilities and restoring its technological edge remain crucial, particularly with the development of the Intel 18A node, including optimising the massive investments in new manufacturing facilities.
While Intel repositioned itself in the AI chip market, falling behind NVIDIA, the new CEO must address Intel’s modest $500 million revenue goal for its Gaudi AI product line and develop a more aggressive strategy to compete in this rapidly growing sector.
Restoring investor confidence remains paramount, as evidenced by the stock’s 52% decline in 2024. Yeary emphasises that the next leader must prioritise putting the product group at the centre of operations while maintaining the company’s commitment to manufacturing competitiveness.
The post What’s Next for Intel? appeared first on Analytics India Magazine.
