Anthropic’s obsession with builders took a significant leap final week with the announcement of Claude Code. Whereas it impressed a number of customers with its potential to run and preview code utilizing the Artifacts function, Claude Code goes one step additional as an ‘agentic coding device’ that operates instantly inside the terminal.
It’s able to fixing bugs throughout a code base, resolving merge conflicts, creating commits and pull requests, and answering questions concerning the structure and logic.
Furthermore, as revealed by the corporate’s chief product officer Mike Krieger, Anthropic’s method is essentially about “choosing its bets” rigorously. With Claude Code, they took a strategic step by first releasing it internally to spice up its personal crew’s efficiency.
“After seeing it play out for a few months, we thought, ‘That is good.’ It’s not an answer for all coding issues, and doesn’t obviate the IDE (built-in growth setting). However it’s helpful to us in sufficient instances that we need to see individuals use it out,” mentioned Krieger, in a podcast episode with enterprise capitalist Harry Stebbings.
“Our product engineers love Claude Code,” he added, indicating that a lot of the work for these engineers lies throughout a number of layers of the product. Notably, it’s in such eventualities that an agentic workflow is useful.
In the meantime, Emmanuel Ameisen, a analysis engineer at Anthropic, mentioned, “Claude Code has been writing half of my code for the previous few months.”
Equally, a number of builders have praised the brand new device. Victor Taelin, founding father of Increased Order Firm, revealed how he used Claude Code to optimise HVM3 (the corporate’s high-performance practical runtime for parallel computing), and achieved a velocity increase of 51% on a single core of the Apple M4 processor.
He additionally revealed that Claude Code created a CUDA model for a similar.
“That is critical,” mentioned Taelin. “I simply requested Claude Code to optimise the repo, and it did.”
A number of different builders additionally shared their expertise yielding spectacular ends in single shot prompting.
Pietro Schirano, founding father of EverArt, highlighted how Claude Code created a whole ‘glass-like’ person interface design system in a single shot, with all the required parts.
Notably, Claude Code additionally seems to be exceptionally quick. Builders have reported carrying out their duties with it in about the identical period of time it takes to do small family chores, like making espresso or unstacking the dishwasher.
Nonetheless, if one is trying on the intersection between AI and coding, Cursor needs to be considered. The AI coding agent just lately reached $100 million in annual recurring income, and a development charge of over 9,000% in 2024 meant that it turned the quickest rising SaaS of all time.
A person on Reddit in contrast each Cursor and Claude Code. The overview acknowledged that Claude Code produces code of “very top quality”. “This factor blows Cursor out of the water. I can’t imagine each use the identical mannequin once I see the distinction in how Claude-3.7 behaves in Cursor and the way it behaves in Claude Code,” the overview added.
“I’ve had no performance breaking errors, which occur once in a while with Cursor, the place it simply breaks one thing or giant information are truncated,” it additional acknowledged.
It’s ‘Insanely Costly’
Anthropic has at all times discovered a candy spot within the hearts of builders for many, if not all, of their merchandise – from Pc Use to MCP, and now the Claude Code. Nonetheless, there has additionally been a justifiable share of criticism.
For one, Claude Code could be very costly because the API pricing for Anthropic’s AI fashions is among the highest on the market.
The Claude 3.7 Sonnet prices $3 per million enter tokens and a whopping $15 per million output tokens. One developer referred to as it “insanely costly” and mentioned they might simply spend $50-$100 on it, whereas agreeing that it’s higher than Cursor.
Matt Popovich, an engineer at Forge, mentioned that Claude Code prices as a lot as hiring a developer.
Nonetheless, autonomous coding brokers are costly, contemplating Devin, the primary to the market, prices a whopping $500 a month, however with no restrict on the variety of seats in an organisation. One other developer mentioned that Claude Code prices him $28 a day, including that it’ll find yourself costing the identical as Devin.
asking claude code to alter the textual content on a label pic.twitter.com/chY4GKKP67
— Tetrabay 3
(@TetraspaceWest) March 4, 2025
Apart from, there are different issues related to Claude Code. A number of customers on GitHub identified that operating a command to automate Claude updates on the Ubuntu Server 24.02 messed with the system file possession, locking customers out of admin entry. Nonetheless, Anthropic did present an answer to mitigate the difficulty.
Furthermore, a couple of builders additionally reminded that AI coding brokers nonetheless have an extended approach to go, and loads of room to raise their scope. Petr Baudis, CTO of Rossum, mentioned on X that Claude Code struggled with sure real-world engineering duties.
He discovered that the device wrote a number of redundant and unreviewable code, and it price $55 to take action.
“To be clear, this from 2023, it’s completely mindblowing that AI can do all this. Nevertheless it’s additionally merely not helpful for precise engineering duties the place plain code-writing isn’t the bottleneck. Not even checks,” he added.
It could be unfair to single out Claude Code, nevertheless, because the state of affairs is kind of comparable with a number of autonomous coding platforms.
The put up ‘Anthropic’s Claude Code Has Been Writing Half of My Code…’ appeared first on Analytics India Journal.
